Gun Control: Myths and Realities

You are currently viewing Gun Control: Myths and Realities

Gun Control: Myths and Realities

by David Lampo

David Lampo is the publications director at the Cato Institute.

The number of well-publicized public shootings during the past few years,

especially the tragedy at Columbine High School, has re-energized the gun

control movement. As a show of strength, a coalition of gun control groups has

organized a “Million Mom March” to be held in Washington, D.C. on Mother’s Day,

an event designed to stir up emotions rather than promote rational thought. And

when one looks at the facts about gun control, it’s easy to see why the

anti-gun lobby relies on emotion rather than logic to make its case.

Think you know the facts about gun control? If your only source of information

is the mainstream media, what you think you know may not be correct. Take the

quiz below and test your knowledge.

1. Thousands of children die annually in gun accidents.

False. Gun accidents involving children are actually at record lows, although

you wouldn’t know it from listening to the mainstream media. In 1997, the last

year for which data are available, only 142 children under 15 years of age died

in gun accidents, and the total number of gun-related deaths for this age group

was 642. More children die each year in accidents involving bikes, space

heaters or drownings. The often repeated claim that 12 children per day die

from gun violence includes “children” up to 20 years of age, the great majority

of whom are young adult males who die in gang-related violence.

2. Gun shows are responsible for a large number of firearms falling into the hands of criminals.

False. Contrary to President Clinton’s claims, there is no “gun show loophole.”

All commercial arms dealers at gun shows must run background checks, and the

only people exempt from them are the small number of non-commercial sellers.

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, at most 2 percent of guns used by

criminals are purchased at gun shows, and most of those were purchased legally

by people who passed background checks.

3. The tragedy at Columbine High School a year ago illustrates the deficiencies of current gun control laws.

False. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold violated close to 20 firearms laws in

amassing their cache of weapons (not to mention the law against murder), so it

seems rather dubious to argue that additional laws might have prevented this

tragedy. The two shotguns and rifle used by Harris and Klebold were purchased

by a girlfriend who would have passed a background check, and the TEC-9 handgun

used by them was already illegal.

4. States that allow registered citizens to carry concealed weapons have lower crime rates than those that don’t.

True. The 31 states that have “shall issue” laws allowing private citizens to

carry concealed weapons have, on average, a 24 percent lower violent crime

rate, a 19 percent lower murder rate and a 39 percent lower robbery rate than

states that forbid concealed weapons. In fact, the nine states with the lowest

violent crime rates are all right-to-carry states. Remarkably, guns are used

for self-defense more than 2 million times a year, three to five times the

estimated number of violent crimes committed with guns.

5. Waiting periods lower crime rates.

False. Numerous studies have been conducted on the effects of waiting periods,

both before and after the federal Brady bill was passed in 1993. Those studies

consistently show that there is no correlation between waiting periods and

murder or robbery rates. Florida State University professor Gary Kleck analyzed

data from every U.S. city with a population over 100,000 and found that waiting

periods had no statistically significant effect. Even University of Maryland

anti-gun researcher David McDowell found that “waiting periods have no

influence on either gun homicides or gun suicides.”

6. Lower murder rates in foreign countries prove that gun control works.

False. This is one of the favorite arguments of gun control proponents, and yet

the facts show that there is simply no correlation between gun control laws and

murder or suicide rates across a wide spectrum of nations and cultures. In

Israel and Switzerland, for example, a license to possess guns is available on

demand to every law-abiding adult, and guns are easily obtainable in both

nations. Both countries also allow widespread carrying of concealed firearms,

and yet, admits Dr. Arthur Kellerman, one of the foremost medical advocates of

gun control, Switzerland and Israel “have rates of homicide that are low

despite rates of home firearm ownership that are at least as high as those in

the United States.” A comparison of crime rates within Europe reveals no

correlation between access to guns and crime.

The basic premise of the gun control movement, that easy access to guns causes

higher crime, is contradicted by the facts, by history and by reason. Let’s

hope more people are catching on.

Leave a Reply


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.